A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Trade Commission relating to "Negative Option Rule".

#57 | SJRES Congress #119

Policy Area: Commerce
Subjects:

Last Action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (6/9/2025)

Bill Text Source: Congress.gov

Summary and Impacts
Original Text

Bill Summary

The joint resolution serves as a formal disapproval by Congress of a specific rule proposed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) concerning the "Negative Option Rule." This rule, published in the Federal Register on November 15, 2024, likely pertains to how businesses can use negative options in their marketing practices, which could allow them to charge consumers automatically unless they opt out. By passing this resolution, Congress is asserting its authority to reject the FTC's regulation, meaning that the rule will not take effect and will have no legal force. This action reflects Congress's oversight role in federal regulatory processes.

Possible Impacts

The Joint Resolution disapproving the Federal Trade Commission's "Negative Option Rule" can affect people in several ways:

1. **Consumer Protection**: The Negative Option Rule aimed to provide consumers with clearer disclosures about negative option marketing practices, where consumers are automatically enrolled in a service or subscription unless they take action to opt out. By disapproving this rule, consumers may face increased risks of being inadvertently charged for services they did not explicitly consent to, leading to potential financial losses or frustration.

2. **Market Competition**: Without the protections that the Negative Option Rule would have provided, companies may feel emboldened to use aggressive marketing tactics that rely on negative options. This could lead to a less competitive market, as consumers may be less inclined to engage with services that employ such tactics, ultimately affecting the variety of options available to them.

3. **Legal and Regulatory Clarity**: The disapproval of the rule creates uncertainty in the regulatory landscape for businesses. Companies that engaged in negative option marketing may not have clear guidelines on how to operate within the law, potentially leading to varied practices that could confuse consumers and result in inconsistent experiences regarding subscription services and marketing communications. This uncertainty could also lead to disputes between consumers and businesses, affecting consumer trust.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 57 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>






119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 57

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Trade 
            Commission relating to ``Negative Option Rule''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 9, 2025

Mr. Lee introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 
 and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Trade 
            Commission relating to ``Negative Option Rule''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Federal Trade Commission relating to ``Negative 
Option Rule'' (89 Fed. Reg. 90476 (November 15, 2024)), and such rule 
shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>