Bill Summary
This joint resolution expresses Congress's disapproval of a specific rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding air quality regulations in Ohio. The rule in question pertains to the "Withdrawal of Technical Amendment," which was published in the Federal Register. By passing this resolution, Congress effectively nullifies the EPA's rule, ensuring that it will not be implemented or enforced. This action is taken under the authority granted by Chapter 8 of Title 5 of the United States Code, which allows Congress to disapprove certain agency rules.
Possible Impacts
Here are three examples of how the congressional disapproval of the Environmental Protection Agency's rule regarding "Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Withdrawal of Technical Amendment" could affect people:
1. **Air Quality Implications**: The disapproval of the EPA rule may lead to the reinstatement of previous air quality regulations in Ohio. This could have both positive and negative effects on public health. On one hand, stricter regulations might improve air quality, potentially reducing respiratory issues and other health problems among residents. On the other hand, if the previous standards are overly stringent, it may lead to increased compliance costs for local businesses, which could affect employment and economic stability in the region.
2. **Economic Impact on Businesses**: The withdrawal of the technical amendment might impose more stringent requirements on industries operating in Ohio. Businesses may face higher costs for compliance with air quality standards, which could affect their profitability and competitiveness. This economic strain might lead to job cuts, reductions in workforce hours, or even business closures, ultimately affecting the livelihoods of employees and their families.
3. **Political and Regulatory Climate**: The congressional disapproval reflects a broader political stance regarding environmental regulations. This could lead to increased polarization among constituents, influencing public opinion and voter behavior regarding environmental issues. Citizens who prioritize environmental protection might feel disillusioned or motivated to advocate for stronger policies, while those who prioritize economic growth may support the disapproval. This dynamic could shape future legislative actions and community engagement on environmental issues in Ohio and beyond.
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 29 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. J. RES. 29
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5,
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental
Protection Agency relating to ``Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Withdrawal of
Technical Amendment''.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
March 3, 2025
Mr. Husted (for himself and Mr. Moreno) introduced the following joint
resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on
Environment and Public Works
_______________________________________________________________________
JOINT RESOLUTION
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5,
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental
Protection Agency relating to ``Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Withdrawal of
Technical Amendment''.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ``Air
Plan Approval; Ohio; Withdrawal of Technical Amendment'' (90 Fed. Reg.
6811 (January 21, 2025)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
<all>