Sanctuary Jurisdiction Event Security Enhancement Act

#3921 | S Congress #119

Policy Area: Immigration
Subjects:

Last Action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (2/25/2026)

Bill Text Source: Congress.gov

Summary and Impacts
Original Text

Bill Summary

The "Sanctuary Jurisdiction Event Security Enhancement Act" aims to establish eligibility requirements for federal funding related to security assessments for major events in jurisdictions that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, known as sanctuary jurisdictions.

Key provisions include:

1. **Eligibility and Ineligibility**: Sanctuary jurisdictions will be ineligible to receive federal funds from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for Special Event Assessment Rating (SEAR) support if they do not comply with federal immigration laws. This includes not sharing information about an individual's immigration status or failing to detain individuals as requested by DHS.

2. **Funding Reallocation**: Funds that would have been allocated for SEAR support in ineligible jurisdictions will be redirected to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for immigration enforcement activities, with an emphasis on addressing public safety threats.

3. **Reporting Requirements**: The Secretary of Homeland Security is mandated to submit semiannual reports to Congress detailing the financial impacts of the legislation and its effectiveness in enhancing event security and immigration enforcement.

Overall, this legislation seeks to enhance national security at major events by linking federal funding to compliance with immigration laws in sanctuary jurisdictions.

Possible Impacts

The "Sanctuary Jurisdiction Event Security Enhancement Act" could affect people in various ways. Here are three examples:

1. **Increased Law Enforcement Presence**: The reallocation of federal funds from sanctuary jurisdictions to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) could lead to increased immigration enforcement activities in those areas. This may result in heightened law enforcement presence and operations, affecting local communities, particularly immigrant populations, who may feel less safe or more targeted due to increased scrutiny and potential deportations.

2. **Impact on Public Events**: Sanctuary jurisdictions that lose access to federal funding for Special Event Assessment Rating (SEAR) support may face challenges in ensuring the safety and security of large public events. Without federal resources for risk assessments, explosive detection teams, and other security measures, there could be increased vulnerabilities at major events, which may lead to public safety concerns and potentially discourage event organizers from holding events in those jurisdictions.

3. **Community Relations and Tensions**: The legislation could exacerbate tensions between local governments and federal authorities, as sanctuary jurisdictions may resist compliance with federal immigration laws. This conflict can strain relationships within communities, potentially leading to divisiveness, fear among immigrant populations, and protests or civil disobedience against perceived overreach by the federal government regarding local governance and public safety priorities.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3921 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>






119th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3921

To establish eligibility requirements for the use of Federal funds for 
Special Event Assessment Rating support in sanctuary jurisdictions and 
 to reallocate such funds to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement 
                  for immigration enforcement efforts.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 2026

  Mr. Scott of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read 
     twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To establish eligibility requirements for the use of Federal funds for 
Special Event Assessment Rating support in sanctuary jurisdictions and 
 to reallocate such funds to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement 
                  for immigration enforcement efforts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sanctuary Jurisdiction Event 
Security Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) The Special Event Assessment Rating program, which is 
        administered by the Department of Homeland Security, assesses 
        risks for major events to ensure public safety and national 
        security.
            (2) Sanctuary jurisdictions, by limiting cooperation with 
        Federal immigration enforcement, may hinder intelligence 
        sharing and increase vulnerabilities at such events, including 
        threats from illegal aliens potentially involved in terrorism 
        or disruptions.
            (3) Examples of such increased vulnerabilities include more 
        than 382 border encounters with individuals on terrorist watch 
        lists along United States borders between fiscal years 2021 and 
        2024, inclusive, and historical cases of foreign-born 
        terrorists illegally entering the United States plotting 
        attacks against our country.
            (4) Conditioning SEAR support on compliance with 
        immigration laws--
                    (A) promotes the general welfare of the American 
                people;
                    (B) is unambiguous;
                    (C) directly relates to event security risks;
                    (D) complies with all relevant provisions in the 
                United States Constitution;
                    (E) does not coerce compliance by sanctuary 
                jurisdictions; and
                    (F) is consistent with the holding by the United 
                States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. Dole (483 U.S. 
                203 (1987)).

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Sanctuary jurisdiction.--The term ``sanctuary 
        jurisdiction'' means a State or a political subdivision of a 
        State that has in effect a statute, ordinance, policy, or 
        practice that prohibits or restricts--
                    (A) sending, receiving, maintaining, or exchanging 
                with any Federal, State, or local government entity 
                information regarding the citizenship or immigration 
                status (lawful or unlawful) of any individual; or
                    (B) complying with a request lawfully made by the 
                Department of Homeland Security under section 236 or 
                287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
                1226 and 1357) to detain an alien.
            (2) SEAR support.--The term ``SEAR support'' means any 
        Federal funds, grants, or resources provided by the Department 
        of Homeland Security for Special Event Assessment Rating 
        activities, including risk assessments, explosive detection 
        teams, cyber support, or other security measures for 
        voluntarily submitted events.

SEC. 4. INELIGIBILITY OF SANCTUARY JURISDICTIONS FOR FEDERAL FUNDING 
              FOR SEAR SUPPORT.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b) and notwithstanding any 
other provision of law, sanctuary jurisdictions are ineligible to 
receive Federal funds for SEAR support for events taking place in such 
jurisdictions, including funding from--
            (1) the Department of Homeland Security's Office of 
        Operations Coordination; or
            (2) related grant programs, such as the Homeland Security 
        Grant Program.
    (b) Notification and Certification Requirements.--The ineligibility 
of a sanctuary jurisdiction to receive Federal funds described in 
subsection (a) shall not take effect unless--
            (1) 30 days has elapsed since the sanctuary jurisdiction 
        was notified by the Secretary of Homeland Security that it is a 
        sanctuary jurisdiction; and
            (2) the sanctuary jurisdiction fails to certify to the 
        Secretary of Homeland Security that it is in full compliance 
        with the immigration laws (as defined in section 101(a)(17) of 
        the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17))), 
        including section 642 of the Immigration Reform and Immigrant 
        Responsibility Act of 1996 (division C of Public Law 104-208; 8 
        U.S.C. 1373).

SEC. 5. REALLOCATION.

    (a) In General.--An amount equal to the reduction in expenditures 
resulting from the ineligibility of certain sanctuary jurisdictions 
under section 4 shall be reallocated to Enforcement and Removal 
Operations of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
    (b) Priority.--Of the amounts reallocated pursuant to subsection 
(a)--
            (1) priority shall be given to immigration enforcement 
        activities in response to public safety threats, including 
        arrests, detentions, and deportations of convicted criminal 
        noncitizens, gang members, and individuals on terrorist watch 
        lists; and
            (2) at least 50 percent shall be expended for border-
        related removals and enforcement operations.

SEC. 6. SEMIANNUAL REPORTS.

    The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit semiannual reports 
to Congress detailing--
            (1) the amount of funds that have been withheld pursuant to 
        section 4;
            (2) the amount of funds that have been reallocated pursuant 
        to section 5;
            (3) the impact such reallocations have had on enforcement 
        outcomes, including the number of arrests, detentions, and 
        deportations; and
            (4) the impact of this Act on reducing risks from illegal 
        aliens at major events.

SEC. 7. SEVERABILITY.

    If any provision of this Act, or the application of such provision 
to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of this 
section, and the application of such provision to other persons or 
circumstances, shall not be affected.
                                 <all>