Bill Summary
The "Buy-to-Budget Flexibility Act" is a legislative proposal aimed at modifying the existing buy-to-budget requirements for end items—presumably in the context of government procurement or defense spending. The bill seeks to amend Section 3069 of Title 10 of the United States Code. Key changes include removing specific conditions tied to agency heads regarding the purchase of complete end items and eliminating several subsections that likely detail procedural requirements. The intention behind these modifications is to provide greater flexibility in budgeting and procurement processes within government agencies, enabling them to better manage their resources and adapt to changing needs.
Possible Impacts
The "Buy-to-Budget Flexibility Act" as described could have several effects on various stakeholders. Here are three examples:
1. **Increased Procurement Efficiency for Agencies**: By modifying the buy-to-budget requirements, government agencies may have more flexibility in how they allocate their budgets for purchasing end items. This could lead to more efficient procurement processes, allowing agencies to prioritize needs based on current circumstances rather than strictly adhering to a predetermined budget. As a result, agencies could respond more swiftly to changing requirements or emergencies, ultimately improving service delivery to the public.
2. **Impact on Contractors and Suppliers**: Suppliers and contractors who provide goods and services to government agencies may experience changes in demand and contract structuring. With the flexibility to adjust budget allocations, agencies might engage more with smaller or niche suppliers who can meet specific needs quickly. This could create new opportunities for businesses but may also increase competition, potentially affecting pricing and profit margins for established contractors.
3. **Potential for Mismanagement or Overspending**: While increased flexibility can lead to improved responsiveness, it could also raise concerns about financial oversight and accountability. Without stringent buy-to-budget requirements, there is a risk that agencies may overspend or misallocate funds, leading to waste or inefficiencies. This could ultimately affect taxpayers and government financial health if not managed properly, necessitating stronger oversight mechanisms to ensure responsible use of public funds.
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2138 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 2138
To modify buy-to-budget requirements for end items, and for other
purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
June 18, 2025
Mr. Sheehy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and
referred to the Committee on Armed Services
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To modify buy-to-budget requirements for end items, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Buy-to-Budget Flexibility Act''.
SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS TO BUY-TO-BUDGET REQUIREMENTS FOR END ITEMS.
Section 3069 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``if that head of an
agency'' and all that follows through ``a complete end item'';
(2) by striking subsections (b) through (d); and
(3) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (b).
<all>