Prototype to Production Act

#2135 | S Congress #119

Subjects:

Last Action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services. (6/18/2025)

Bill Text Source: Congress.gov

Summary and Impacts
Original Text

Bill Summary

The "Prototype to Production Act" aims to modify existing legislation regarding the Department of Defense's (DoD) authority to engage in "other transactions," which are flexible agreements used for research and development projects.

Key provisions of the Act include:

1. **Scope of Authority**: It allows for prototype projects or follow-on production contracts to be awarded when the cost exceeds $100 million, contingent on a written determination by the head of the contracting activity or specific agency directors, ensuring accountability.

2. **Non-Delegation of Authority**: The authority to approve these transactions cannot be delegated, reinforcing the responsibility of senior officials in the acquisition process.

3. **Definitions**: The Act clarifies terms related to the contracting process, including what constitutes a "follow-on production" contract.

4. **Rapid Fielding**: It introduces provisions for awarding production contracts without competitive procedures in exceptional circumstances, enabling quicker acquisition of proven technologies to meet urgent military needs.

Overall, the legislation is designed to enhance the DoD's ability to efficiently transition innovative prototypes into operational capabilities, addressing high-priority requirements more effectively.

Possible Impacts

The "Prototype to Production Act" introduces modifications to the existing other transaction authority, which can significantly affect various stakeholders. Here are three examples of how this legislation could impact people:

1. **Defense Contractors and Small Businesses:**
The legislation allows for prototype projects and follow-on production contracts exceeding $100 million to be awarded with a written determination by heads of contracting activities without requiring competitive procedures in certain circumstances. This change could benefit defense contractors, especially small businesses that may have innovative technologies but lack the resources to compete against larger firms in traditional bidding processes. By streamlining the acquisition process, these businesses may find it easier to secure contracts and contribute to the defense sector, thereby potentially leading to job creation and economic growth in their communities.

2. **Military Personnel and Warfighters:**
By enabling rapid fielding of existing capabilities and proven technologies without extensive development, the legislation can lead to faster deployment of advanced systems and equipment to military personnel. This means that warfighters could receive upgraded tools and technologies more quickly, enhancing their operational effectiveness and safety. The ability to address high-priority needs in a timely manner is critical for maintaining military readiness and effectiveness in dynamic combat situations.

3. **Government Oversight and Accountability:**
The bill's stipulation that the authority to award production transactions cannot be delegated may increase accountability within the Department of Defense. The higher level of oversight could ensure that decisions regarding significant contracts are made by senior officials who understand the implications, thus potentially reducing the risk of mismanagement or misuse of funds. However, it could also slow down the contracting process, as fewer individuals are authorized to make such decisions, which may frustrate those advocating for rapid acquisition in urgent situations.

These examples illustrate the multifaceted impact of the legislation, affecting not only the defense industry but also military personnel and government operations.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2135 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>






119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2135

     To modify other transaction authority, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2025

  Mr. Sheehy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
     To modify other transaction authority, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prototype to Production Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS TO OTHER TRANSACTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 4022 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:
    ``(2) The authority of this section may be exercised for a 
transaction for a prototype project, or for a transaction for a follow-
on production contract or transaction that is awarded pursuant to 
subsection (f) or (g), that is expected to cost the Department of 
Defense in excess of $100,000,000 (including all options) only upon a 
written determination that the requirements of subsection (d) will be 
met by a head of the contracting activity, or, for the Defense Advanced 
Research Projects Agency, the Defense Innovation Unit, or the Missile 
Defense Agency, the director of the agency.''; and
                    (B) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows:
    ``(3) The authority of the head of the contracting activity, the 
director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the director 
of the Defense Innovation Unit, the director of the Missile Defense 
Agency, or the senior procurement executive, as applicable, under 
paragraph (2), may not be delegated.'';
            (2) in subsection (e)--
                    (A) by amending paragraph (1) to read as follows:
            ``(1) The term `head of the contracting activity' means 
        those officials within the organization who have responsibility 
        for and manage an acquisition organization and usually hold 
        unlimited procurement authority.''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following new 
                paragraph:
            ``(6) The term `follow-on production' means a contract or 
        transaction that is intended to further develop, test, produce, 
        deploy, operate, or sustain a capability that was successfully 
        prototyped under the authority established in subsection 
        (a).'';
            (3) by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as subsections 
        (i) and (j), respectively; and
            (4) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(h) Authority To Award a Production Transaction to Rapidly Field 
an Existing Capability.--A production transaction may be awarded, with 
or without the use of competitive procedures, to acquire emergent and 
proven technologies and field production quantities of new or upgraded 
systems that do not require additional development and have been 
demonstrated in a relevant environment when the appropriate service or 
component acquisition executive determines in writing that exceptional 
circumstances justify the use of such a transaction to address a high 
priority warfighter need.''.
                                 <all>