Science of Reading Act of 2026

#7890 | HR Congress #119

Last Action: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 33 - 0. (3/17/2026)

Bill Text Source: Congress.gov

Summary and Impacts
Original Text

Bill Summary

The "Science of Reading Act of 2026" aims to amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 by promoting evidence-based literacy instruction aligned with the "science of reading." This legislation explicitly excludes the "three-cueing model," an instructional approach that relies on context, pictures, and syntax for teaching word recognition.

Key provisions include:

1. **Definition of Science of Reading**: Establishes a clear definition of the "science of reading," which encompasses essential components of reading instruction such as phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary, fluency, comprehension, and writing. It emphasizes the importance of background knowledge and the connection between reading and writing.

2. **Grant Prioritization**: States applying for comprehensive literacy development grants must demonstrate alignment with the science of reading. This includes plans for both early education (birth through kindergarten) and K-12 education that prioritize evidence-based literacy instruction.

3. **General Provisions**: The act clarifies that it does not alter existing rights under special education laws and does not give federal authorities control over local instructional content or curriculum decisions.

Overall, the legislation seeks to enhance literacy education by ensuring that instructional practices are rooted in research-backed methodologies.

Possible Impacts

The "Science of Reading Act of 2026" introduces specific changes to literacy instruction approaches in educational settings. Here are three examples of how this legislation could affect people:

1. **Students' Literacy Development**: By prioritizing instructional methods aligned with the "science of reading," which includes evidence-based practices like phonemic awareness and phonics, students may experience improved reading outcomes. This could lead to a more systematic approach to literacy development, helping struggling readers acquire essential skills more effectively and reducing the number of students falling behind in reading proficiency.

2. **Educators' Instructional Strategies**: Teachers may need to adapt their teaching methods to comply with the new legislation that excludes the three-cueing model. This could require professional development and training to ensure that educators are equipped to implement the science of reading approaches. As a result, teachers may find their instructional practices shifting toward more structured and evidence-based strategies, which could enhance their effectiveness in teaching reading.

3. **Funding and Resource Allocation**: States and local educational agencies will need to align their comprehensive literacy instruction plans with the science of reading to qualify for grants and subgrants. This could result in changes to how educational resources are distributed, potentially leading to increased funding for programs that prioritize evidence-based reading instruction. Consequently, schools may have access to better materials and supports that promote effective reading practices, benefiting both students and educators.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7890 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






119th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7890

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to exclude 
     certain instructional approaches from comprehensive literacy 
    instruction, to prioritize certain funds to promote the use of 
evidence-based literacy instruction and supports aligned to the science 
                  of reading, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2026

 Mrs. Houchin (for herself, Mr. Mannion, and Mr. Kiley of California) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        Education and Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to exclude 
     certain instructional approaches from comprehensive literacy 
    instruction, to prioritize certain funds to promote the use of 
evidence-based literacy instruction and supports aligned to the science 
                  of reading, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Science of Reading Act of 2026''.

SEC. 2. PROMOTING READING INSTRUCTION ALIGNED TO SCIENCE OF READING.

    (a) Comprehensive Literacy Instruction.--Section 2221(b) of the 
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6641(b)) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (K), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) in subparagraph (L), by striking the period and 
                inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(M) does not include the use of a three-cueing 
                model.''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Science of reading.--The term `science of reading' 
        means an interdisciplinary body of evidence-based research 
        about reading and issues related to reading and writing that--
                    ``(A) identifies instruction in phonemic awareness, 
                phonics, vocabulary, fluency, comprehension, and 
                writing as essential components to skilled reading;
                    ``(B) demonstrates the importance of background 
                knowledge, oral language, the connection between 
                reading and writing, and strong writing instruction;
                    ``(C) explains why some students have difficulty 
                with reading and writing; and
                    ``(D) does not use a three-cueing model.
            ``(5) Three-cueing model.--The term `three-cueing model' 
        means an instructional approach or model that--
                    ``(A) uses meaning drawn from context, pictures, or 
                syntax as the primary basis for teaching word 
                recognition (commonly referred to as `meaning, 
                structure and syntax, and visual cues' or `MSV'); or
                    ``(B) teaches visual memory as the primary basis 
                for word recognition.''.
    (b) State Applications for Comprehensive Literacy State Development 
Grants.--Section 2222(d)(2) of the Elementary and Secondary Education 
Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6642(d)(2)) is amended by inserting at the end--
                    ``(F) A description of the extent to which the 
                State comprehensive literacy instruction plan is 
                aligned to the science of reading.''.
    (c) Comprehensive Literacy State Development Grant Priority.--
Section 2222(e) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 6642(e)) is amended by striking the period at the end and 
inserting ``, that are aligned to the science of reading.''.
    (d) Comprehensive Literacy State Development Subgrant Priority.--
            (1) Birth through kindergarten entry.--Section 2223(c) of 
        the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
        6643(c)) is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``grants'' and inserting 
                ``subgrants'';
                    (B) by striking ``grant'' and inserting 
                ``subgrant''; and
                    (C) by striking the period at the end and inserting 
                ``, that are aligned to the science of reading.''.
            (2) Kindergarten through grade 12.--Section 2224(b) of the 
        Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
        6644(b)) is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``grants'' and inserting 
                ``subgrants''; and
                    (B) by striking the period at the end and inserting 
                ``that are aligned to the science of reading.''.

SEC. 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

    (a) Applicability.--This Act and the amendments made by this Act 
shall apply with respect to funds awarded under the Elementary and 
Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 note et seq.) on or 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Rules of Construction.--Nothing in this Act or the amendments 
made by this Act shall be construed to--
            (1) limit or alter the rights, protections, and 
        individualized instructional requirements under the Individuals 
        with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), 
        section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), 
        or the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12101 et 
        seq.); or
            (2) authorize any officer or employee of the Federal 
        Government to mandate, direct, or control a State, local 
        educational agency, or school's specific instructional content, 
        academic standards and assessments, curricula, or program of 
        instruction.
                                 <all>