Audit the Pentagon Act of 2026

#7555 | HR Congress #119

Subjects:

Last Action: Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services. (2/12/2026)

Bill Text Source: Congress.gov

Summary and Impacts
Original Text

Bill Summary

The "Audit the Pentagon Act of 2026" aims to improve the financial accountability of the Department of Defense (DoD) by mandating that the DoD achieves a clean audit opinion on its financial statements. This follows a concerning trend where the Pentagon failed its eighth consecutive audit in December 2025, during which it could not account for a significant portion of its assets.

Key provisions of the bill include:

1. **Financial Accountability**: The Act expresses the sense of Congress that, while budget cuts are necessary, they should not compromise the safety and welfare of military personnel. It also emphasizes the need for simplified asset valuations without undermining financial controls.

2. **Spending Reductions**: Starting in fiscal year 2026, if the DoD does not receive an unqualified audit opinion, it will face mandatory budget reductions of 0.5% for the fiscal year in question and 1.0% for subsequent years. These cuts will be applied evenly across all programs and activities, with some critical accounts, like military personnel and health programs, being exempt.

3. **Presidential Waiver**: The President can waive these reductions for specific accounts if the cuts would negatively impact national security or military operations, with a requirement to report to Congress on the details.

4. **Reporting Requirements**: The Office of Management and Budget must report to Congress within 60 days of any budget reduction detailing which parts of the DoD are affected and the extent of the reductions.

Overall, the legislation aims to enforce stricter financial oversight within the DoD, ensuring that taxpayer dollars are managed responsibly while maintaining the necessary support for military operations.

Possible Impacts

The "Audit the Pentagon Act of 2026" could have several implications for people, including:

1. **Impact on Defense Programs and Personnel**: If the Department of Defense fails to achieve a clean audit opinion, funding for various defense programs may be reduced. This could affect critical areas such as military training, equipment acquisition, and support services, potentially compromising the effectiveness and readiness of the Armed Forces. Troops may face delays or shortages in essential gear, impacting their safety and operational capabilities.

2. **Financial Accountability and Transparency**: The act aims to enhance financial accountability within the Department of Defense by requiring clean audits. Improved transparency in defense spending may lead to more efficient use of taxpayer dollars, potentially resulting in better-funded social programs or services for veterans and military families, as funds redirected from wasteful expenditures could bolster these areas.

3. **Economic Effects of Spending Reductions**: The stipulated spending reductions could impact local economies that rely on defense contracts and military installations. Communities that host military bases or defense contractors may experience job losses or economic downturns if funding is cut for defense projects. This could lead to a ripple effect, affecting local businesses and services that depend on the economic activity generated by the military and defense sectors.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7555 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






119th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7555

To ensure that the Department of Defense achieves a clean audit opinion 
          on its financial statements, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2026

Mr. Pocan (for himself, Mr. Biggs of Arizona, Ms. Omar, Ms. Simon, Mr. 
McGovern, Mrs. Ramirez, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Norton, Mr. DeSaulnier, Ms. 
Stansbury, Mr. Nadler, Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, 
 Ms. Tlaib, Mrs. Foushee, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, 
Mr. Davis of Illinois, and Ms. Jayapal) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To ensure that the Department of Defense achieves a clean audit opinion 
          on its financial statements, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Audit the Pentagon Act of 2026''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

            (1) The Pentagon failed its 8th consecutive audit in 
        December 2025.
            (2) In November 2023, upon failure of its 6th consecutive 
        audit, the Pentagon was unable to account for hundreds of 
        billions of dollars, accounting for 63 percent of its nearly $4 
        trillion in assets.

SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) as the overall defense budget is cut, the congressional 
        defense committees and the Department of Defense should not 
        endanger the Armed Forces by reducing wounded warrior accounts 
        or vital protection (such as body armor) for members of the 
        Armed Forces serving in harm's way;
            (2) the valuation of legacy assets by the Department of 
        Defense should be simplified without compromising essential 
        controls or generally accepted government auditing standards; 
        and
            (3) nothing in this Act should be construed to require or 
        permit the declassification of accounting details about 
        classified defense programs, and, as required by law, the 
        Department of Defense should ensure financial accountability in 
        such programs using proven practices, including using auditors 
        with security clearances.

SEC. 4. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SPENDING REDUCTIONS IN THE ABSENCE OF AN 
              UNQUALIFIED AUDIT OPINION.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Reductions.--If, during any fiscal year after fiscal 
        year 2025, the Comptroller of the Department of Defense fails 
        to certify to Congress that a department, agency, or other 
        element of the Department of Defense has achieved an 
        unqualified opinion on its full financial statements, the 
        amount available for such department, agency, or element shall 
        be reduced--
                    (A) for the fiscal year during which such 
                determination is made, by an amount equal to 0.5 
                percent; and
                    (B) for any subsequent fiscal year during which 
                such determination is made, by an amount equal to 1.0 
                percent.
            (2) Application of reductions.--For any fiscal year for 
        which a reduction is made pursuant to paragraph (1) for a 
        department, agency, or element, the amount of the reduction 
        shall be applied on a pro rata basis against each program, 
        project, and activity of such department, agency, or element 
        for that fiscal year.
            (3) Use of reduced amounts.--The amount of any reduction 
        made under paragraph (1) shall be deposited in the General Fund 
        of the Treasury and shall be available for purposes of deficit 
        reduction.
    (b) Accounts Excluded.--The following accounts are excluded from 
any reductions under subsection (a):
            (1) Military personnel, reserve personnel, and National 
        Guard personnel accounts of the Department of Defense.
            (2) The Defense Health Program account of the Department of 
        Defense.
    (c) Waiver.--The President may waive subsection (a) with respect to 
an account if the President--
            (1) certifies that the application of such subsection to 
        that account would--
                    (A) negatively affect the national security of the 
                United States or members of the Armed Forces who are 
                deployed in combat zones; or
                    (B) affect the Defense Health Program account; and
            (2) submits to the Committee on Appropriations and the 
        Committee on the Budget of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on the Budget of 
        the Senate a report on such waiver that includes a description 
        of the specific activities that would be affected and why such 
        activities are essential to the national security of the United 
        States.
    (d) Report.--Not later than 60 days after a reduction takes effect 
under subsection (a), the Director of the Office of Management and 
Budget shall submit to Congress a report specifying each department, 
agency, or other element of the Department of Defense subject to 
reduction and the amount of the reduction.
    (e) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) The terms ``financial statement'' and ``external 
        independent auditor'' have the meanings given those terms in 
        section 3521(e) of title 31, United States Code.
            (2) The term ``unqualified'', with respect to the audit 
        status of a financial statement, includes the characterizations 
        clean and unmodified.
                                 <all>