Protect Our Judiciary Act of 2025

#5721 | HR Congress #119

Subjects:

Last Action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. (10/8/2025)

Bill Text Source: Congress.gov

Summary and Impacts
Original Text

Bill Summary

The "Protect Our Judiciary Act of 2025" is a proposed piece of legislation that seeks to amend existing federal law regarding the prohibition of picketing or parading near certain judicial locations. Specifically, it targets activities occurring in or near the residences or offices of judges, jurors, witnesses, or court officers.

The bill modifies Section 1507 of Title 18 of the United States Code by removing previous exemptions and explicitly stating that individuals who knowingly engage in picketing or parading near these locations, as well as those who use sound trucks or other demonstration methods, would face penalties. Violators could be fined or imprisoned for up to one year, or both. The intent of the legislation is to protect the integrity and safety of the judicial process by limiting public demonstrations that could influence or intimidate those involved in the legal system.

Possible Impacts

The "Protect Our Judiciary Act of 2025," as outlined in the provided legislation, could have several impacts on individuals and communities. Here are three examples:

1. **Impact on Public Demonstrations**: The legislation prohibits picketing or parading near the residences or buildings associated with judges, jurors, witnesses, or court officers. This could lead to a significant reduction in the ability of activists and community members to publicly express their opinions or protest against judicial decisions. For example, individuals protesting against a controversial court ruling may find it more difficult to gather and voice their concerns, limiting free expression and public discourse.

2. **Legal Consequences for Protesters**: The law imposes fines and possible imprisonment for those who knowingly engage in picketing or parading in prohibited areas. This could deter individuals from participating in protests, particularly in high-profile cases. For example, someone might be hesitant to join a peaceful demonstration near a courthouse or judge's residence due to the fear of legal repercussions, thereby chilling their willingness to engage in civic activism.

3. **Effect on Judicial Independence and Safety**: By creating a buffer around judicial officials and their residences, the legislation aims to protect them from potential harassment or intimidation. While this may enhance their safety and allow them to perform their duties without fear, it could also foster a perception among the public that judicial processes are insulated from scrutiny. This could lead to a lack of transparency and accountability in the judicial system, as citizens may feel that their ability to question or challenge judicial actions is being undermined.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5721 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5721

    To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit picketing or 
               parading certain buildings or residences.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2025

Mr. Rouzer (for himself and Mr. Fallon) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
    To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit picketing or 
               parading certain buildings or residences.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Our Judiciary Act of 2025''.

SEC. 2. PICKETING OR PARADING.

    Section 1507 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``, or in or near a building or residence 
        occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court 
        officer''; and
            (2) by inserting after the first sentence the following: 
        ``Whoever knowingly pickets or parades in or near a building or 
        residence being used by any judge, juror, witness, or court 
        officer, or uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts 
        to any other demonstration in or near any such building or 
        residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not 
        more than one year, or both.''.
                                 <all>